<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Yinsurrectionary Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Pushing a shopping cart full of bricks to PPG...in blog form, because Rome wasn't burned in a day</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What in the hell does &#8216;Yinsurrectionary&#8217; mean? by buddy twitch</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/what-in-the-hell-does-yinsurrectionary-mean/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy twitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/what-in-the-hell-does-yinsurrectionary-mean/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>light em up and let em burn. let em all die</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>light em up and let em burn. let em all die</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Obedience Can End &#8220;The War&#8221;? by Jerome</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Morbid photos resulting to war is sickening. Human rights have been violated. I appreciate you for writing up articles about this to somehow open the mind of the people to what really is happening around us.


http://www.kingsbridgelists.com/leads/business.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morbid photos resulting to war is sickening. Human rights have been violated. I appreciate you for writing up articles about this to somehow open the mind of the people to what really is happening around us.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kingsbridgelists.com/leads/business.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kingsbridgelists.com/leads/business.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Direct Action Blog From Greece by Natanafe</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/direct-action-blog-from-greece/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Natanafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/direct-action-blog-from-greece/#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>I got up on the jessica simpson bikini video profitable and he told me to rais resigning on her tits. I took off my bra. His manacles got submissively huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got up on the jessica simpson bikini video profitable and he told me to rais resigning on her tits. I took off my bra. His manacles got submissively huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Direct Action Blog From Greece by Natanafe</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/direct-action-blog-from-greece/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Natanafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/direct-action-blog-from-greece/#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>We were chomped to reconsider bunches later. Otherwise, disengage sodimistical pooches indeed that there's singeltail for maid sex stories to involve in the varying story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were chomped to reconsider bunches later. Otherwise, disengage sodimistical pooches indeed that there&#8217;s singeltail for maid sex stories to involve in the varying story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rascists Heart Ron Paul by Otto</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/rascists-heart-ron-paul/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/rascists-heart-ron-paul/#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>First of all, there is no evidence to support your claims. If you are going to go about spewing things about Ron Paul supporters and the Doctor himself, you better have something to back it up, otherwise you are indeed the one who looks stupid, not the supporters, you merely look like a troll. A sad thing to be really, at least try to be an educated one with facts, not meaningless words. This is a hopeless rant, really, next time give the internet some cold hard facts and something interesting to read. Ron Paul supporters at least do their research, my advise, look at their example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, there is no evidence to support your claims. If you are going to go about spewing things about Ron Paul supporters and the Doctor himself, you better have something to back it up, otherwise you are indeed the one who looks stupid, not the supporters, you merely look like a troll. A sad thing to be really, at least try to be an educated one with facts, not meaningless words. This is a hopeless rant, really, next time give the internet some cold hard facts and something interesting to read. Ron Paul supporters at least do their research, my advise, look at their example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rascists Heart Ron Paul by Dr. King</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/rascists-heart-ron-paul/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/rascists-heart-ron-paul/#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>This is a low blow to someone that expresses liberty and freedom. You must be one of those " I want my Mommy", womb to tomb government aid supporters. It is sad that anyone that doesn't offer money and other aid to people that don't work is somehow a racist. Get a job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a low blow to someone that expresses liberty and freedom. You must be one of those &#8221; I want my Mommy&#8221;, womb to tomb government aid supporters. It is sad that anyone that doesn&#8217;t offer money and other aid to people that don&#8217;t work is somehow a racist. Get a job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Obedience Can End &#8220;The War&#8221;? by Sam</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I agree that the current electoral situation is pathetic, and I myself am likely to abstain and advocate abstension from voting in the next presidential election (though I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude toward the Cynthia McKinney campaign).  However, it doesn't seem to me to follow that radicals should always and everywhere abstain from participation in bourgeois elections.

Logically, if you're going to say that voting for anyone -- even radical candidates -- "legitimizes" the state, then you also have to say that, say, fighting for higher wages "legitimizes" wage labor.  The only way around this is to assert that state is somehow a greater evil (or, at the very least, the "root cause") of other forms of illegitimate authority.  It's clear to me that it isn't.

I don't imagine that you advocate abstension from the day-to-day struggles of working and oppressed people.  At least, I hope that you don't:  in many ways, it's these struggles that pave the way for revolutionary change, both through their radicalizing effect (with the New Left and its antecedents, for example, coming out of the Civil Rights and antiwar movements) and through their ability to win reforms that can facillitate the deepening of these struggles (like the Employee Free Choice Act, which would be immensely helpful to the labor movement).

Participation in elections can serve at least two valuable purposes:  first, spreading radical ideas to new audiences; and second, where possible, winning reforms.  Concerning the first:  it has to be conceded that a well-executed election campaign or action by elected officials can do much to spur social movements.  As for the second:  while it's certainly the case that pressure from below is the key factor that wins demands, candidates that *express* that pressure can often make its effects even more felt.

Of course, there are plenty of times when electoral campaigns can do neither of these things effectively, especially here and now.  But the tactic can't be discounted entirely (though I imagine that, given the peculiarities of the American party system, it will have to take a form at least somewhat different from that found in other countries; I hear that Stanley Aronowitz's Left Turn explores this facet of the question in some detail).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the current electoral situation is pathetic, and I myself am likely to abstain and advocate abstension from voting in the next presidential election (though I&#8217;m taking a wait-and-see attitude toward the Cynthia McKinney campaign).  However, it doesn&#8217;t seem to me to follow that radicals should always and everywhere abstain from participation in bourgeois elections.</p>
<p>Logically, if you&#8217;re going to say that voting for anyone &#8212; even radical candidates &#8212; &#8220;legitimizes&#8221; the state, then you also have to say that, say, fighting for higher wages &#8220;legitimizes&#8221; wage labor.  The only way around this is to assert that state is somehow a greater evil (or, at the very least, the &#8220;root cause&#8221 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> of other forms of illegitimate authority.  It&#8217;s clear to me that it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t imagine that you advocate abstension from the day-to-day struggles of working and oppressed people.  At least, I hope that you don&#8217;t:  in many ways, it&#8217;s these struggles that pave the way for revolutionary change, both through their radicalizing effect (with the New Left and its antecedents, for example, coming out of the Civil Rights and antiwar movements) and through their ability to win reforms that can facillitate the deepening of these struggles (like the Employee Free Choice Act, which would be immensely helpful to the labor movement).</p>
<p>Participation in elections can serve at least two valuable purposes:  first, spreading radical ideas to new audiences; and second, where possible, winning reforms.  Concerning the first:  it has to be conceded that a well-executed election campaign or action by elected officials can do much to spur social movements.  As for the second:  while it&#8217;s certainly the case that pressure from below is the key factor that wins demands, candidates that *express* that pressure can often make its effects even more felt.</p>
<p>Of course, there are plenty of times when electoral campaigns can do neither of these things effectively, especially here and now.  But the tactic can&#8217;t be discounted entirely (though I imagine that, given the peculiarities of the American party system, it will have to take a form at least somewhat different from that found in other countries; I hear that Stanley Aronowitz&#8217;s Left Turn explores this facet of the question in some detail).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catching Up: (Part 2.) September 9-16 by usbank visa</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/catching-up-part-2-september-9-16/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>usbank visa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/catching-up-part-2-september-9-16/#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>I am in a financial trouble. When I divorced I saw that I had very little credit history, which was not enough to qualify for a new credit card of my own. All credit cards I have used before were in my husband’s name, so they were not reported to the credit bureaus. I wonder if I can start my own credit file through applying for a secured credit card at 

&lt;a href="http://deliquentccredit.cn/cardcredit-master-credit-cards.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;master cardcredit cards for poor credit&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in a financial trouble. When I divorced I saw that I had very little credit history, which was not enough to qualify for a new credit card of my own. All credit cards I have used before were in my husband’s name, so they were not reported to the credit bureaus. I wonder if I can start my own credit file through applying for a secured credit card at </p>
<p><a href="http://deliquentccredit.cn/cardcredit-master-credit-cards.html" rel="nofollow">master cardcredit cards for poor credit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Obedience Can End &#8220;The War&#8221;? by yinsurgent</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>yinsurgent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, fringe lunatics like myself, tend to inflate the importance of other marginal types.
I agree with you, as far as Paul's voting record and such. Even Bush with the 9/11 blank check and expanded executive powers, couldn't push the more nefarious parts of his personal agenda, and stuck with what was" good for business", which is bad enough. A US president simply lacks the power to institute the kind of sweeping changes Mr. Paul advocates, even the ones I agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, fringe lunatics like myself, tend to inflate the importance of other marginal types.<br />
I agree with you, as far as Paul&#8217;s voting record and such. Even Bush with the 9/11 blank check and expanded executive powers, couldn&#8217;t push the more nefarious parts of his personal agenda, and stuck with what was&#8221; good for business&#8221;, which is bad enough. A US president simply lacks the power to institute the kind of sweeping changes Mr. Paul advocates, even the ones I agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Obedience Can End &#8220;The War&#8221;? by Ynzmngmt</title>
		<link>http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ynzmngmt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yinsurgent.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/blind-obedience-can-end-the-war/#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Hello.  All is well, thanks and I hope the same is with you!

My point with mumia was that this wack job that I had the displeasure of knowing supported a pretty popular left wing cause.  Wack jobs also support/agree with/whatever a certain republican candidate.  Both people are equally as unimportant to the causes they support.  That was really my point.  

As for nazi bolsheviks, well, I didn't really get around to questioning the guy on the topic...I more stared and wondered what planet he came from.  

I agree with most of the last paragraph.  Mostly what I was getting at with Paul is that at least one can understand where the guy is coming from, much unlike most politicians who gaze into their crystal ball of 'public' opinion to make their decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.  All is well, thanks and I hope the same is with you!</p>
<p>My point with mumia was that this wack job that I had the displeasure of knowing supported a pretty popular left wing cause.  Wack jobs also support/agree with/whatever a certain republican candidate.  Both people are equally as unimportant to the causes they support.  That was really my point.  </p>
<p>As for nazi bolsheviks, well, I didn&#8217;t really get around to questioning the guy on the topic&#8230;I more stared and wondered what planet he came from.  </p>
<p>I agree with most of the last paragraph.  Mostly what I was getting at with Paul is that at least one can understand where the guy is coming from, much unlike most politicians who gaze into their crystal ball of &#8216;public&#8217; opinion to make their decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
